 |
 |
the ddecay file is the correct one. The mistakes areincorrect cut and pastes ... If you could edit BAD/note540 we would really be grateful ... alternatively a list of mistakes you find is welcome ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > comparing ddecay.table with the table you have in the BAD 540v9 (table 16, > p.85) I noticed that some of the values do not agree, this occurs for both > the PDG values and the MC values listed. Have there been changes in the MC > (and the measured values) since then? > > Thanks, > Kerstin > >