Print

---

Hi Ric,

Ok, I am glad it did not turn out to be anything unfindable.. (so far).
Will you let me know about the disk space then? I saw you will be
discussing that.

Thanks,
Kerstin


On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote:

> you are right, I hadn;t picked up the updated init.icc
> 	ciao
> 	ric
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Riccardo Faccini
> Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma
> tel  +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini
> Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica
>
> "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree"
>
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Ric,
> >
> > I had a look at the signal MC ntuples. The variables I checked are in
> > there, but for some reason neudaugen, chgdaugen and brecoqual seem to be
> > screwed up. So far I have no idea why because they are ok in the test I
> > made last week (I checked that again, they look fine there). That is
> > really strange. In the version of init.icc I have they are initialized
> > properly:
> >   fBrecoQual = 0;
> >   fchgDau = 0;
> >   fneuDau = 0;
> > Could you maybe check if your init.icc has these lines? Since I do not get
> > mail when something is committed to VubAnalysis I cannot check whether
> > maybe I forgot to include init.icc when committing or something similar.
> >
> > Kerstin
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kerstin,
> > > I am testing the tag with the Brehm right now.
> > > Can you quickly check I got all your variables? there root files are in
> > > ~rfaccini/scra/root/anaQA-r00
> > >
> > >
> > >  If everything goes fine I  will submit directly all jobs for systematics
> > > directly tonight (and you do not need to do it as well) and send out a
> > > tag. You will just have to run your special MC separately,
> > > waiting for the disk space for your signal to be available ...
> > > 	ciao
> > > 	ric
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Riccardo Faccini
> > > Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma
> > > tel  +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697
> > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini
> > > Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica
> > >
> > > "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree"
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > some quick questions concerning the production of reduced ntuples:
> > > >
> > > > - I just saw that Virginia and Concezio also seem to plan on producing
> > > > reduced ntuples -> Maybe we could coordinate who is going to do what so
> > > > things are not done twice? Daniele, are you using the same signal MC
> > > > (Sorry for not knowing...).
> > > > We need our big signal MC ntuples, but as far as the reduced ntuples for
> > > > the systematics are concerned, maybe it yould not hurt you (Virginia,
> > > > Concezio, maybe Daniele) if you are using our larger version as well, so
> > > > we do not need a large and a normal version (just as idea).
> > > >
> > > > - Ric, is there a final tag that is supposed to be used for the production
> > > > of the reduces ntuples (I think there were also changes in runQA?)?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kerstin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>