 |
 |
Hi Urs, these are exactly the results I get. So I assume you can go ahead and do your studies, while we keep trying to figureout this small difference we all have with Virginia ... ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi, > > I am trying to reproduce the fits (PRL like for speed reasons) and I > tried to follow > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/VirFitter_instr.html > > I run on > > fileVubTotal :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root > fileVubTotalres :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root > fileVubTotalnres :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubnre_small.root > fileVcb :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-genb-new_small.root > fileVcb1 :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root > fileVcb2 :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root > fileData :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-data_small.root > > > I have the HEAD of VirVubFitter. > > I obtain > > BRBR Command > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 0.0196 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -opt 1 -rew 1 -wF sysWd/refWeights -flag binmes-rew-1-opt-1 > 0.0279 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -rew 1 -opt 1 -debug -flag prlresult > 0.0193 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -rew 1 -wF sysWd/refWeights -flag binmes-rew-1 > > The first line is from the webpage, the second line is from > "SubVirFit.pl -h". The third is w/o "-opt 1". I am not surprised the > second does not work because I guess it misses the weight file. But I > don't know why the first line is 5% away from the result. > > Is this to be expected? If not, could somebody in the know please post > an exact line that I can copy-paste to reproduce the PRL as close as > possible? > > Cheers, > --U. >