 |
 |
yep, this is what we want to sqitch to (pending a check that it does not spoil systematics). I think you should add your code on top of this and then we should rerun anaQA (once you commit we can discuss it offline) ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > just to avoid misunderstanding: Is this what we should be using and what > Virginia and Concezio will be using as well? If yes I will try to put in > our additional variables and code pieces. > > Thanks, > Kerstin > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Daniele del Re wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > after some checks done by Ed we decided that what is already in cvs is > > ok. The tag is > > > > VubAnalysis ddr-040904 > > > > the brem recovery is already switched on in b0cuts.dat > > (bremrecovery 1) > > > > Let me know if you have any trouble. > > > > Daniele > > >