 |
 |
Hi- I think the plan would be to do any new production in the latest release (14 series) and use the skimmed/merged/converted CM2 data/MC, not objy for input to make our ntuples. This speeds up the production greatly - see our webpage linked from the ISL page. Of course, we will need disk space for the venture - although we won't be storing BOTH hbook and root this time, which will save space. Production was last done in 10 series, so we've essentially *skipped* the 12 series. However, the major change from 10 to 12 is RW migration, which I did do in the 12 series. There are probably small issues of comp. sequences and list name configurations but thats all minor stuff. Anyhow, who cares - production will be done in 14 series on CM2 collections. Cheers, Ed On Tuesday 06 April 2004 07:52 am, Urs Langenegger allegedly wrote: > Hoi Henning, > > Ed will correct me if/when I am wrong ... > > > so if I understand Urs correctly, we could run with the current > > IslBrecoilUser over run 3 data, writing out the usual "big ntuples"? > > Not exactly, as run 3 is release 12, whereas our old executable was > analysis-14, i.e. a 10-series. But that change is manageable, Ed has > done it already. > > An added benefit is the 700/fb of generic BB. :-) > > Cheers, > --U.