 |
 |
Please excuse my naivety, but why had we even bothered wasting the CPU at beta level in the previous production to do PID killing if we were just going to do it at ntuple level anyhow? Ed On Friday 23 April 2004 09:15 am, Daniele del Re allegedly wrote: > well, only the kaon id was redone at the ntuple level. BTW even redoing it > at the ntuple level the tables are still missing... > For sure we can start the production. We could in principle redo it once > the tables will be available. > > Daniele > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > > Hi, > > do we need PID-killing to start production? Aren't we applying the PID > > killing at ntuple level anyhow? We can well run with default selectors if > > I am not wrong > > ciao > > ric > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > Riccardo Faccini > > Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma > > tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini > > Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica > > > > "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" > > > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Edward Hill wrote: > > > Hi- > > > > > > Just incase you hadn't seen this HN post, we'll have to wait on PID > > > killing... > > > > > > http://babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu:5090/HyperNews/get/partID/790.html > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ed