 |
 |
Hi Kertin, the recipe is: - take those variations and treat them as uncorrelated. - we should also consider the variations correponding to the 1sigma contours according to CLEO's largest variation, but we will discuss this in more detail next week ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" On Thu, 13 May 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > Hi, > > what is the plan for the evaluation of the theory error? We produced > spectra with varied values of mb and a using Dominique's weight files. > Should we treat the variations as correlated or uncorrelated? I remember > that the studies Virginia and Concezio showed last week assumed no > correlation between mb and a. Will this be the final way (at least for now > and in the de Fazio-Neubert approach) to treat this uncertainty? > > Cheers, > Kerstin >