 |
 |
OK, I missed your point. Heiko On Thu, 6 May 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > Hi Heiko, > this is what I meant: "we - BRBR measurement - don't need it, but you > should see what has been done by thorsten" > > Sorry if I was not clear > ciao > ric > > ______________________________________________________ > Riccardo Faccini > Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma > tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini > Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica > > "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > Hi Ric, > > > > but Daniele showed already that the mX-spectrum changes > > significantly when applying the bremsstrahlung recovery. > > > > So, it may affect the measurement of the mX spectrum, > > that is the unfolding. > > > > Cheers, > > Heiko > > > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > > > > > Hi Kerstin, > > > bremsstrahlung typically has a relevant effects on moments. In the case of > > > a cut on a variable (mX) which has a >350 MeV resolution, it does not seem > > > to be a problem we should worry about. > > > > > > Also, the fact that Daniele's algorithm has changed our result within the > > > rounding used to quote it shows we should not worry about it. > > > > > > I think you should mutuate the studies from BAD 636 where thorsten had to > > > take care of the problem in detail > > > ciao > > > ric > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > Riccardo Faccini > > > Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma > > > tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 > > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini > > > Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica > > > > > > "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" > > > > > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > as you know we are currently redoing the systematics we had with the new > > > > signal MC reweighting, bremsstrahlung recovery and new ddecay.table and > > > > also work on the systematics which we were still missing with the former > > > > reweightings and ntuples. > > > > > > > > Apart from the sources of uncertainties listed in BAD 540 we might have to > > > > consider a systematic uncertainty coming from the simulation of > > > > bremsstrahlung and final state radiation in the MC. We should do this > > > > consistently with what you are doing. Is there already some recipe which > > > > you use or plan to use (together with Daniele's bremsstrahlung recovery)? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Kerstin > > > > > > > > > > > > > >