 |
 |
Hi Ed, yes, you are right about the order... I hope this doesn't affect anything else. Still I think it would be better to get rid of that line in the setup script. One more question about the PID killing/weighting. As there are no links to the PID tables, this doesn't get applied right now. Is it still ok to source envMc.csh or should BtaPidKillMuon and BtaPidKillElectron be explicitely unset (as for data)? Thanks, Henning On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Edward Hill wrote: > > Henning- > > I don't know what the historical reason for that is. I think that if you do > an srtpath after you source the setup script, it should be okay b/c that'll > set the version of root to be whatever is included in the release (i assume). > I think that's the order i reccommend on the webpage. Either way, i'm sure > you could eliminate that from the setup script at this point. > > Cheers, > Ed > > > On Friday 11 June 2004 10:48 am, Henning Ulrik Flaecher allegedly wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that ROOTSYS gets unset in envMC.csh > > With ROOTSYS set, the following error messages disappear when querying a > > collection. > > Is there a particular reason why ROOTSYS is unset? > > Should we/ do we need to change this? > > > > Thanks Henning > >