 |
 |
Hi Chris, OK, agreed. I can work on it while I'm in China, but it will probably not happen as soon as you'd like. What's the possibility of you kludging something for a bit? Andy On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I haven't spoken to Manny yet but on point two I would suggest that since > the documentation states that the '-x' option overides the 'xfrcmd' > directive in the config file then the format of the argument should be > treated exactly the same. Is there any reason why this should not be the > case? > > Any idea how long it take to get these changes in? > > Yours, > Chris. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [log in to unmask] > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > > Andrew Hanushevsky > > Sent: 17 September 2004 00:13 > > To: Emmanuel Olaiya; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: OSS/MPS staging bugs? > > > > > > Hi Manny, > > > > > 1) According to the manual the oss.stagecmd gets give two arguments > > > sourcefn and targetfn, as far as we can tell these are > > passed backwards. > > > i.e. targetfn sourcefn. > > Quite correct! We never noticed this because the local root > > and remote root > > are always the same. So, here (and IN2P3) files on disk have > > the same name > > as files in the MSS. I will fix this. > > > > >> 2) Within mps_Stage the xfrcmd directive is not treated > > the same as the > > > -x option. If we run: > > Quite correct also. How would you like this one to work? This > > is actually > > the first time anyone actually tried to specify the command > > in the config > > file. > > > > Andy > > >