 |
 |
Hi Manny, No problem. The changes are now checked into CVS (both the mps_Stage out of xrootd and the mps_Stage xfrcmd directive). Andy On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote: > Hi Andy > > Sorry you keep getting replies from people who you didn't address the mail > to. But I'll be looking at this and it shouldn't be a problem for me to > "kludge" it until you come up with a new version. > > cheers > > Manny > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > OK, agreed. I can work on it while I'm in China, but it will probably not > > happen as soon as you'd like. What's the possibility of you kludging > > something for a bit? > > > > Andy > > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote: > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > I haven't spoken to Manny yet but on point two I would suggest that since > > > the documentation states that the '-x' option overides the 'xfrcmd' > > > directive in the config file then the format of the argument should be > > > treated exactly the same. Is there any reason why this should not be the > > > case? > > > > > > Any idea how long it take to get these changes in? > > > > > > Yours, > > > Chris. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [log in to unmask] > > > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > > > > Andrew Hanushevsky > > > > Sent: 17 September 2004 00:13 > > > > To: Emmanuel Olaiya; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] > > > > Subject: Re: OSS/MPS staging bugs? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Manny, > > > > > > > > > 1) According to the manual the oss.stagecmd gets give two arguments > > > > > sourcefn and targetfn, as far as we can tell these are > > > > passed backwards. > > > > > i.e. targetfn sourcefn. > > > > Quite correct! We never noticed this because the local root > > > > and remote root > > > > are always the same. So, here (and IN2P3) files on disk have > > > > the same name > > > > as files in the MSS. I will fix this. > > > > > > > > >> 2) Within mps_Stage the xfrcmd directive is not treated > > > > the same as the > > > > > -x option. If we run: > > > > Quite correct also. How would you like this one to work? This > > > > is actually > > > > the first time anyone actually tried to specify the command > > > > in the config > > > > file. > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > >