 |
 |
Hi Andy I agree with Chris here. If would be great if the xfrcmd directive behaved the same as the -x option. cheers Manny Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote: >Hi Andy, > >I haven't spoken to Manny yet but on point two I would suggest that since >the documentation states that the '-x' option overides the 'xfrcmd' >directive in the config file then the format of the argument should be >treated exactly the same. Is there any reason why this should not be the >case? > >Any idea how long it take to get these changes in? > >Yours, >Chris. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [log in to unmask] >>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >>Andrew Hanushevsky >>Sent: 17 September 2004 00:13 >>To: Emmanuel Olaiya; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] >>Subject: Re: OSS/MPS staging bugs? >> >> >>Hi Manny, >> >> >> >>>1) According to the manual the oss.stagecmd gets give two arguments >>>sourcefn and targetfn, as far as we can tell these are >>> >>> >>passed backwards. >> >> >>>i.e. targetfn sourcefn. >>> >>> >>Quite correct! We never noticed this because the local root >>and remote root >>are always the same. So, here (and IN2P3) files on disk have >>the same name >>as files in the MSS. I will fix this. >> >> >> >>>>2) Within mps_Stage the xfrcmd directive is not treated >>>> >>>> >>the same as the >> >> >>>-x option. If we run: >>> >>> >>Quite correct also. How would you like this one to work? This >>is actually >>the first time anyone actually tried to specify the command >>in the config >>file. >> >>Andy >> >> >>