 |
 |
Hi, my personal point of view is that we better first concentrate on getting the analysis running and then we can have a more detailed look into this topic. This should of course not prevent anybody from looking into this though. Cheers, Heiko On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > Ciao Franco, > we are starting working on this for mx-q2, but I am not sure we will be > able to report about that on monday. > Concezio. > > On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 11:57, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > Kerstin and Marco did start to look into this based on MC. > > The mX-Q^2 analysis part did not look into this issue for > > what has been presented at ICHEP. > > > > Heiko > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Franco Simonetto wrote: > > > > > Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >we are supposed to give a status report at next Monday's AWG-meeting. > > > > > > > >I know that Concezio and Kerstin will present some material. > > > > > > > >I would suggest that also Roberto could say where we stand with the > > > >migration to CM2. My understanding is that this is more or less > > > >finished, correct? > > > > > > > >Are there any news from the kinematic fitter land? If so, it would be > > > >also good to give a short update on that. > > > > > > > >In any case, we need to inform asap the convenors who is going to present > > > >material and a time estimate for the talk. > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > >Heiko > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao Heiko > > > did anybody in your sub group yet start to look at lepton end point > > > differences for B0 and B+ > > > tagged samples ? Can anybody provide next Monday some rough estimate of > > > the sensitivity for this comparison from fully reconstructed B-samples ? > > > Cheers > > > Franco > > > > > > > >