 |
 |
Hi Heiko et al., On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote: > * discussion on the Publication strategy > My proposal: Aim for Moriond QCD/CKM2005 with a preliminary result > > Problem: Need to go into collaboration wide review until ... > (Moriond QCD is March 12-19) Yes, this is tight. > Question: Can we show something at CKM2005 which has only the > AWG approval, i.e. something which has been in principle > already improved for ICHEP2004 but is presented then with > the full Run1-Run4 statistics? I think anything we show at CKM2005 will need pubboard approval (Ric can tell me if management disagrees). That does not mean that it needs to have a CONF note, but there must be enough documentation for AWG, RC and BaBar signoff on the physics. Bob \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////// / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \ \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria / / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \ \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 / /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\