 |
 |
Hi Bob, On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote: > Hi Heiko et al., > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > * discussion on the Publication strategy > > My proposal: Aim for Moriond QCD/CKM2005 with a preliminary result > > > > Problem: Need to go into collaboration wide review until ... > > (Moriond QCD is March 12-19) > > Yes, this is tight. > > > Question: Can we show something at CKM2005 which has only the > > AWG approval, i.e. something which has been in principle > > already improved for ICHEP2004 but is presented then with > > the full Run1-Run4 statistics? > > I think anything we show at CKM2005 will need pubboard approval (Ric can > tell me if management disagrees). That does not mean that it needs to > have a CONF note, but there must be enough documentation for AWG, RC and > BaBar signoff on the physics. Yeap. Then we need to hurry up. Cheers, Heiko > Bob > > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////// > / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \ > \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria / > / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \ > \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 / > /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ > >