 |
 |
Hi again, On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Hi, > > to get something preliminary out for Moriond QCD we need to go into > collaboration wide review on February the 18th. > > I think we need to go to the RC at latest beginning of February. In > other words we need to have the sign-off from the AWG at the end of > January, e.g. 31st of January. That is, the documentation must be > ready well in advance, let's say a week, e.g. 24th of January. > > Does this tentative timeline make sense? Yes, it makes sense, and it's very tight. We need to evaluate by mid- January which recoil analyses (if any) will make it. If it looks like some or all will not, then we might be better off putting the effort into updating the interpretation of the Run 1-2 recoil results with an eye toward showing an up to date (using the new Neubert calculation if possible and the updated numbers from Bauer-Ligeti-Luke for q2-Mx) BaBar Vub average at CKM2005. Bob \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////// / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \ \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria / / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \ \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 / /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\