 |
 |
Hi, I put the results.dat files from the tests on generic MC we made so far here (splitting genMC up as we described): http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~kerstin/vubfit/ and the files are: ichep_mxhad_fullmc6results.dat ichep_mxhad_fullmc7results.dat ichep_norewfullmc6results.dat where the first two ones are for mxhad and the third is for mxhadfit. 6 has to be compared to 6. Unfortunately I recognized that the second file for mxhadfit got lost between summer and now. The numbers I was reading were in my notes. According to my notes for ichep_norewfullmc7results.dat: BRBR = 0.0146 +- 0.0015 +- 0.0010 but that is all I wrote down in summer, sorry. I hope that helps a little for now. I will run the same jobs but without splitting up the genMC but use the whole set for generic MC and as data. Kerstin On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Hi Roberto, > > this maybe comes a bit too late: > Do you happen to have also these > kind of plots for non-resonant > signal MC? > > Talk to you in a few minutes. > > Cheers, > Heiko > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Roberto Sacco wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > you will find in > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~sacco/meetings/2005-01-11/kinfit.html > > > > Some of the plots whe should discuss tomorrow. > > > > All the best, > > > > Roberto > > > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we should have an off-week meeting tomorrow > > > as our time schedule is tight. > > > > > > For those who want to participate please send > > > me your phone number and I will call you. > > > (At SLAC: it would be nice that you are > > > coming together in just one office.) > > > > > > Time: 9:00 SLAC time > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Heiko > > > > > >