 |
 |
Thanks a lot. Heiko On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > Hi Heiko, > Zoltan presented an update of the mx-q2 acceptances at the Vub-SF > workshop in December. You can have a look at page 5 of his presentation > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Public/Organization/2004/workshops/vxb2004/ligeti.pdf > > Ciao, Concezio. > > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:06, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote: > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > to get something preliminary out for Moriond QCD we need to go into > > > > collaboration wide review on February the 18th. > > > > > > > > I think we need to go to the RC at latest beginning of February. In > > > > other words we need to have the sign-off from the AWG at the end of > > > > January, e.g. 31st of January. That is, the documentation must be > > > > ready well in advance, let's say a week, e.g. 24th of January. > > > > > > > > Does this tentative timeline make sense? > > > > > > Yes, it makes sense, and it's very tight. We need to evaluate by mid- > > > January which recoil analyses (if any) will make it. If it looks like > > > some or all will not, then we might be better off putting the effort into > > > updating the interpretation of the Run 1-2 recoil results with an eye > > > toward showing an up to date (using the new Neubert calculation if > > > possible and the updated numbers from Bauer-Ligeti-Luke for q2-Mx) BaBar > > > Vub average at CKM2005. > > Do you have already any news concerning the new Neubert calculation > > and updated numbers from Bauer-Ligeti-Luke for q2-Mx? > > > > Heiko > > > > > Bob > > > > > > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////// > > > / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \ > > > \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria / > > > / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \ > > > \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 / > > > /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ > > > > > > > >