Print

Print


Hi Gregory,

I should have a fix for the DNS problem by this weekend. I'm not quite sure 
how we'll release that due to release timeframes. So, stay tuned!

Andy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregory Schott" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "abh" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "Wilko Kroeger" <[log in to unmask]>; "Peter Elmer" 
<[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: xrootd meeting - Tuesday 29 March, 2005


> Hello Andy and Wilko,
>
> Yes I realise it is due to the software version I am running on this 
> dataserver. The september one did not support writting.
>
> I cannot use the latest online versions due to the DNS problem crashing 
> xrootd.
>
> What I could do would be to use a version from January but these are not 
> downloadable anymore! Why do you hide older versions? Do I have to do a 
> website 'mirroring' so that I can use, in the future, the software version 
> I need?
>
> Cheers,
>   Gregory
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, abh wrote:
>
>> Hi Gregory & Wilko,
>>
>> Yes, now I recall. Sorry, I though you were running the latest version. 
>> The version you are running was not able to export more than one 
>> directory. Thanks Wilko for reminding me of that!
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilko Kroeger" 
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: "Gregory Schott" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Cc: "abh" <[log in to unmask]>; "Peter Elmer" <[log in to unmask]>; 
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: xrootd meeting - Tuesday 29 March, 2005
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Gregory
>>>
>>> Does it work to write to root://f01-001-124:1094////tmp/dummy.root ?
>>> I just installed your version and I also see that I can't write to 
>>> xrootd
>>> except /tmp. Even in this case the message,
>>> Error accessing path/file for root://datadevsol01:2094////tmp/trds.test
>>> is printed but the file is actually transfered.
>>>
>>> Could you install a newer version of xrootd? I see that you are using 
>>> the
>>> version 20040907-0403 which is quite old. The best would be to use the
>>> version 20050328-0656.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>  Wilko
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Gregory Schott wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>
>>>>    About my writing problem...
>>>>
>>>>    I got confused and probably got you confused too but I don't want 
>>>> (and
>>>> need) this machine to be managed by the redirector. I had however
>>>> forgotten to comment the odc.manager option.
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>>    My config file is then the following (I believe it is a config file 
>>>> problem):
>>>>
>>>> # dataserver.cf
>>>> #
>>>> oss.alloc * * 80
>>>> oss.fdlimit * max
>>>> oss.localroot /home/xrootd/disk/kanga/EventStore/
>>>> #oss.path /home/xrootd/disk/kanga/EventStore/ writable
>>>>
>>>> xrd.protocol xrootd *
>>>>
>>>> xrootd.export /prod
>>>> xrootd.export /store
>>>> xrootd.fslib /home/xrootd/software/current/lib/libXrdOfs.so
>>>>
>>>> odc.trace redirect
>>>> olb.trace all
>>>> oss.trace all
>>>> xrd.trace all
>>>> xrootd.trace all
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>>    The error message I get with xrdcp is:
>>>>
>>>> Error accessing path/file for root://f01-001-124:1094//prod/dummy.root
>>>>
>>>> PS: I can actually read the file if I xrdcp the other way around so the
>>>> path is accessible for read. According to the documentation the default 
>>>> is
>>>> write allowed (except if I use oss.readonly). The unix directory rights
>>>> also allow xrootd to write there.
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>>    And in the (verbose) log file is:
>>>>
>>>> 050331 01:51:45 15028 Exporting /store
>>>> 050331 01:51:45 15028 Exporting /prod
>>>> 050331 01:51:45 15028 XRootd protocol version 2.2.0 build 20040907-0403 
>>>> successfully loaded.
>>>> 050331 01:51:45 15028 xrd@f01-001-124:1094 initialization completed.
>>>> 050331 01:51:45 15028 XrdMain: thread 10251 assigned to user handler
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15042 XrdNet: Accepted tcp connection from 
>>>> l01-001-122.gridka.de
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15042 ?:[log in to unmask] XrdUser: connection 
>>>> accepted
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 XrdSched: new worker; tid=11276; num=2
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 XrdSched: running [log in to unmask] inq=0
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 XrdProtocol: matched protocol xrootd
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 ?:[log in to unmask] XrdPoll: FD 13 
>>>> attached to poller 0; num=1
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 ?:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0000 
>>>> req=3007 dlen=0
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] 
>>>> XrootdResponse: 0000 sending OK
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 XrootdXeq: User logged in as 
>>>> xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask]
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] 
>>>> XrootdProtocol: 0000 req=3010 dlen=16
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 ofs_open: xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] 
>>>> Unable to create /prod/dummy.root; No such file or directory
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] 
>>>> XrootdResponse: 0000 sending err 3011: Unable to create 
>>>> /prod/dummy.root; No such file or directory
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] XrdPoll: 
>>>> sending poller 0 detach for link 13
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15036 XrdPoll: Poller 0 detached fd 13 entry 1 now at 1
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] XrdPoll: FD 
>>>> 13 detached from poller 0; num=0
>>>> 050331 01:52:14 15035 XrdLink: xrootd.12395:[log in to unmask] 
>>>> disconnected after 0:00:00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Gregory
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, abh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> 050329 19:08:51 6914 odc_Open: Unable to connect socket
>>>> >> /tmp/.olb/olbd.admin; connection refused
>>>> > Is teh log truncated or did this connection succeed?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >> bash-2.05a$ cat config/dataserver.cf
>>>> >> odc.manager babar2 3121
>>>> > Probably doesn't make a difference but one should expand this out >
>>>> completely
>>>> > with the domain name.
>>>> >
>>>> >> #olb.subscribe babar2 3121
>>>> > Same thing about expansion. However, why is this commented out? With 
>>>> > a
>>>> > sunscribe entry, no data server will particpate in the setup. So, 
>>>> > this >
>>>> system
>>>> > should not work (in fact it should complain and the olbd should exit 
>>>> > on the
>>>> > adat servers).
>>>>
>>>
>>
>