Print

Print


Hi,

maybe Wolfgang intended to list only those systematics 
where we have to establish refined procedure?

Heiko

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Concezio Bozzi wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang,
> I think that your list of systematics overemphasizes the detector part, 
> whereas at the moment we have larger contributions from other sources, 
> namely signal and background knowledge and mES fits.
> Concezio.
> 
> Wolfgang Menges wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >	at the AWG meeting this morning we got the advice to start writing
> >the conference paper. We should discuss who will do that.
> >
> >We also should briefly discuss how to proceed after the conference paper.
> >I have collected a few ideas from a discussion with Roberto. Have a look
> >at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~menges/Vub/Todo-vubBreco.html.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >	Wolfgang
> >
> >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Concezio Bozzi wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Heiko,
> >>I have agreed with the BRECO Vub review committee [Vera still TBC] to
> >>meet tomorrow (tuesday) at 9am PT, so we can use the first half an hour
> >>for internal discussion and start with the RC afterwards.
> >>Concezio.
> >>
> >>
> >>Heiko Lacker wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>it might be useful to have a
> >>>VubRecoil meeting tomorrow.
> >>>I'll call in.
> >>>
> >>>Heiko
> >>>
> >>>510-665-5437 and passcode #2146
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Wolfgang Menges
> >Queen Mary, University of London                 SLAC, MS 35
> >Mile End Road                                    2575 Sand Hill Road
> >London, E1 4NS, UK                               Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
> >++44 20 7882 3753                                ++1 650 926 8503
> >                                                 [log in to unmask]
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  
> >
> 
>