Hi, maybe Wolfgang intended to list only those systematics where we have to establish refined procedure? Heiko On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > I think that your list of systematics overemphasizes the detector part, > whereas at the moment we have larger contributions from other sources, > namely signal and background knowledge and mES fits. > Concezio. > > Wolfgang Menges wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > at the AWG meeting this morning we got the advice to start writing > >the conference paper. We should discuss who will do that. > > > >We also should briefly discuss how to proceed after the conference paper. > >I have collected a few ideas from a discussion with Roberto. Have a look > >at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~menges/Vub/Todo-vubBreco.html. > > > >Cheers, > > > > Wolfgang > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hi Heiko, > >>I have agreed with the BRECO Vub review committee [Vera still TBC] to > >>meet tomorrow (tuesday) at 9am PT, so we can use the first half an hour > >>for internal discussion and start with the RC afterwards. > >>Concezio. > >> > >> > >>Heiko Lacker wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>it might be useful to have a > >>>VubRecoil meeting tomorrow. > >>>I'll call in. > >>> > >>>Heiko > >>> > >>>510-665-5437 and passcode #2146 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Wolfgang Menges > >Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35 > >Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road > >London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA > >++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503 > > [log in to unmask] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >