 |
 |
Hi, if new weights need to be computed it is now in principle in the hands of Alexei although it should be still possible to do it independently following Dominique's recipe. Heiko P.S.: Cc'ed Alexei, just in case. On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Edward Hill wrote: > > Concezio- > > That is not the case unfortunately. Daniele and I had a phone conversation > with Dominique a few weeks ago on this matter. When we manually vary an > exclusive BF, we have to compensate in the weighting of the non-res such that > the total assumed BF of the signal MC remains constant. I.e. lower an excl > BF -> increase the non-res contribution. As a result, for the CM1 MC, I have > the proper weight files for all of the various exclusive BF systematic > studies. If anyone wants them, email me. > > I don't know if Dominique is subscribed to vub-recoil - so i added him to the > email at this level. > > Cheers, > Ed > > On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:42 am, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > >I think the corrections factor should be (I left my notes in the office) > > > > > > N_h BF_new > > > k = ---- * ---------------- > > > N_r BF_res+BF_nonres > > > > after discussions with Ed/Daniele I had assumed this "magic factor" had > > to be set once for all for the default and that the reweighting file > > would have taken care of the variations of the exclusive BF > > automatically. So we did not recompute it for the systematic studies of > > the exclusive BF. > > > > Concezio. >