 |
 |
Concezio- That is not the case unfortunately. Daniele and I had a phone conversation with Dominique a few weeks ago on this matter. When we manually vary an exclusive BF, we have to compensate in the weighting of the non-res such that the total assumed BF of the signal MC remains constant. I.e. lower an excl BF -> increase the non-res contribution. As a result, for the CM1 MC, I have the proper weight files for all of the various exclusive BF systematic studies. If anyone wants them, email me. I don't know if Dominique is subscribed to vub-recoil - so i added him to the email at this level. Cheers, Ed On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:42 am, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > >I think the corrections factor should be (I left my notes in the office) > > > > N_h BF_new > > k = ---- * ---------------- > > N_r BF_res+BF_nonres > > after discussions with Ed/Daniele I had assumed this "magic factor" had > to be set once for all for the default and that the reweighting file > would have taken care of the variations of the exclusive BF > automatically. So we did not recompute it for the systematic studies of > the exclusive BF. > > Concezio.