 |
 |
Hi Heiko, let me try to answer as Chukwudi is at the RAL summer school and I am not sure when he will be able to log on. AFAIK, the files to look at are: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/sysp1_8.sxc It contains the new charged (b1) and neutral (b0) B's branching fractions for different values of mb and a along the Belle ellipse (I believe those are the standard points 1->8 on the ellipse as can be found when submitting the jobs. "0" corresponds to the centroid of the ellipse, ie to the standard value we use). 1D indicates the Mx analysis and 2D indicate the Mx q^2 analysis. The last column of the first two tables shows the error on the asymmetry. The largest errors are ~4-5%. On the same web page, there is also sysp13_25.sxc which still shows the results due to variations of the shape function parameters in the points 13->25 on 'sheet 2'. Instead 'sheet 1' of sysp13_25.sxc shows the effect due to changing the reweighting of the signal according to the weights in: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/common/dominique_hybrid.html/old/hybrid.html The errors are shown in the columns "1D Asym Relative err" and "2D Asym Relative err" for the two analyses. The results, expecially for the Mx analysis, really need some planning on what we want to do (perhaps we can discuss it at the next meeting? At QM, we will try to come out with a plan to discuss by then) Cheers, Francesca On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Is it everything which starts with 'sys'? > > Cheers, > Heiko > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Chukwudi Clarke wrote: > > > Hi you all can have a look at the systematics that have been done so far > > concerning charged and neutral Bs at > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/ > > Cheers, C.C. > > >