 |
 |
Short corrcetion: Concezio just sent me an email saying that he cannot on Thursday next week. So Let's meet on Friday, 20th of January, next week. Concezio & Roberto: please keep us informed already before where you are standing and what kind of problems you are encountering. Cheers, Heiko On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Hi, > > as a follow-up Concezio, Francesca and myself had a discussion. > Concezio will give a short status report on Monday in the AWG meeting. > > Here is the tentative time schedule/working agenda: > > 0. Content of the publication: We want to have results for > * mX-q^2 > * mX > * P+ > * difference in charged and neutral B's > > Concerning quoting the result we intend to show them for > * SF parameters obtained from b->s gamma + b->clnu moments > * SF parameters obtained from b->s gamma spectrum > * mX-q^2: results quoted for different regions that can be > used by B->Xsll > > * For HFAG purposes (not in paper): separate numbers for > b->s gamma + b->clnu moments > > > 1. Improve our mES fit procedure! > This might solve various open problems we have seen: > - problems in 1-bin unfolding > - instabilities in mm^2 scans > - unphysically large differences in B+ and B0 partial BF's > This is the bottle-neck of the analysis. > > Concezio and Roberto will keep in close contact and try to > settle this as fast as possible. > > We are proposing to meet next Thursday instead of Tuesday since Concezio > is travelling next Tuesday. The same we want to do in the next-to-next > week. If 8:45 for next two Thursday's imposes a problem please speak up! > Otherwise I will shift the phone conference reservations for the next > two weeks to Thursday. > > 2. Once the m_ES fit procedure is settled which is hopefully the case on > the time scale of 1-2 weeks we need to decide on the neutral & track > selection. For this we need to redo the mm^2 scans. Roberto, what is > your time estimate for doing this? > > 3. Systematics > a) During 1. & 2. Wolfgang can improve on the PID systematics procedure. > b) Kerstin: Is it possible to use the code as it is we are using for > re-weighting the multiplicity categories to apply it on the analysis? > If so, we could reduce the hadronization uncertainty without too much > code development. Otherwise we should stick to the more conservative > treatment. > c) Klong: Wolfgang, do you have any news from David? > If there is nothing avaiable very soon we have to stick to > the old recipe. > d) Running the systematics is expected to take about 1 week. > I assume this is shared at least by Roberto and Wolfgang. > What about the availability of Antonio? > > 4. Documentation: > 1) BAD: volunteer? > 2) PRL draft: Heiko volunteering > > > If there are additional inputs for Concezio please let him know in time. > > > Cheers, > Heiko > > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > here is the list of things to-be-done (modulo stuff I forgot, > > so please correct me): > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Task: Person Status > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > * mES fits Roberto > > > > * improve systematics procedure: > > - PID Wolfgang > > - Klong Wolfgang > > - Hadronization: It would be nice to > > reduce the 3% quoted if time allows. > > Currently, we are conservative. > > > > * Repeat systematics after final > > track & neutral selection fixed: > > - Tracking eff. ? > > - Neutral Eff. ? > > - Neutral Corr. ? > > - K_L ? > > - PID eff. and misID ? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > - mES shape ? > > - mES parameters ? > > - eps-double-ratio ? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > - SF parameters ? > > - SF form ? > > - Excl. b->ulnu ? > > - Hadronization ? > > - Gluon splitting ? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > - B SL BF's ? > > - D BF's ? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > * writing supporting document ? > > > > * writing PRL draft Heiko > > > > > > Cheers, > > Heiko > > >