 |
 |
Hi, Fabrizio! it's srm's port for incoming requests. Artem. On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Fabrizio Furano wrote: > Hi Artem, > > Artem Trunov wrote: > > hi, Fabrizio! > > > > > >>>Yuo can also do usefull stuff with default protocol. Yuo can test how your > >>>srm interacts with xrootd(s) and what URLs it gives out for get/put > >>>requests. > >> > >>Well, this is my intention but I have no ideas. How can I send a request > >>to the srm server? Possibly bypassing the scripts. > > > > > > yuo can try srmcp from srmclient package - this is the commandline srm > > copy tool. > > > > srmcp srm://yourserver:8843/path file:/tmp/test1 > > > > Well, that's one of the scripts I'd like to bypass. > Anyway, what's that 8843 port number? Is it needed to contact the srm > server in the machine "yourserver" ? > > > > Fabrizio > > > > > I hope it could give some usefull result to you before bumping into luck > > of grid infrastructure. Although, I am doubtfull, since it needs > > authorization on the first place... Yuo can also try soap messages > > directly :( . Timur may give more usufull advise. > > > > Artem. > > > > > >>>Yuo don't need to do the actual transfers? I guess. I will set > >>>up a testbed with classical stogage element and validate the transfer. > >>> > >> > >>In principle I wrote teh java code also for that. I totally ignore if it > >>works. I don't want to give away code written but *never* run.... so I > >>believe you have to wait some more time... sorry. Anyway the deployment > >>is not that hard. But definitely you need postgres. > >> > >>Fabrizio > >> > >> > >>>Artem. > >>> > >>>On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Fabrizio Furano wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi Timur, > >>>> > >>>> I just managed to get my custom srm server started! > >>>> > >>>> But now I have no idea about what to do. Is there a way to inhoculate > >>>>get/put requests directly to the server to debug it? > >>>> > >>>> I gave a look at the scripts in the srmclient directory, but I don't > >>>>believe that they are the answer. Moreover, the protocol matchings are > >>>>done inside the scripts, so I believe I'd need to modify them all to > >>>>include a new protocol. > >>>> > >>>>Thank you > >>>> > >>>>Fabrizio > >>>> > >> >