Hi Artem, Artem Trunov wrote: > hi, Fabrizio! > > >>>Yuo can also do usefull stuff with default protocol. Yuo can test how your >>>srm interacts with xrootd(s) and what URLs it gives out for get/put >>>requests. >> >>Well, this is my intention but I have no ideas. How can I send a request >>to the srm server? Possibly bypassing the scripts. > > > yuo can try srmcp from srmclient package - this is the commandline srm > copy tool. > > srmcp srm://yourserver:8843/path file:/tmp/test1 > Well, that's one of the scripts I'd like to bypass. Anyway, what's that 8843 port number? Is it needed to contact the srm server in the machine "yourserver" ? Fabrizio > I hope it could give some usefull result to you before bumping into luck > of grid infrastructure. Although, I am doubtfull, since it needs > authorization on the first place... Yuo can also try soap messages > directly :( . Timur may give more usufull advise. > > Artem. > > >>>Yuo don't need to do the actual transfers? I guess. I will set >>>up a testbed with classical stogage element and validate the transfer. >>> >> >>In principle I wrote teh java code also for that. I totally ignore if it >>works. I don't want to give away code written but *never* run.... so I >>believe you have to wait some more time... sorry. Anyway the deployment >>is not that hard. But definitely you need postgres. >> >>Fabrizio >> >> >>>Artem. >>> >>>On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Fabrizio Furano wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi Timur, >>>> >>>> I just managed to get my custom srm server started! >>>> >>>> But now I have no idea about what to do. Is there a way to inhoculate >>>>get/put requests directly to the server to debug it? >>>> >>>> I gave a look at the scripts in the srmclient directory, but I don't >>>>believe that they are the answer. Moreover, the protocol matchings are >>>>done inside the scripts, so I believe I'd need to modify them all to >>>>include a new protocol. >>>> >>>>Thank you >>>> >>>>Fabrizio >>>> >>