 |
 |
Hello Andy, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: >Hi Pavel, > >Could you give me the symptoms that made it appear to not work? The first >one should have worked. If it dod not, this is a bug and will be fixed. > > I am sorry, I am getting it back. I tried it again and it is working. I probably was looking on different node. Sorry for inconvience. Both possibilities work. Next time I will check it multiple times before write a email. >In any case, a supervisor node needs *both* 'ofs.redirect remote' *and* >'ofs.redirect target' specified and it is subject to a redirection as well >as redirecting itself. Specifying only "remote" will not work in most >cases since the supervisor will not connect to the local olbd and off >failures will occur (this pointed out that the protocol spec was a bit >fuzzy on this, sigh). > > Thank you, I forgot that supervisor must have both remote and local. >So, you should also have the line: > >ofs.redirect target if named supervisor > >Anyway, I will check on this. > >Andy > > >P.S. I am in the process of simplifying the configuration which will make >the "redirect" statement superfluous (though upwardly acceptable). > > That would be great. >On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, pjakl wrote: > > > >>Hi guys, >> >>I have deployed latest development version 20060307 and tried to >>simplify my config file using INSTANCE_NAME and if statement. >>I wrote this to the config file and for that particular node it didn't work: >> >>if named dataserver >> ofs.redirect target >>else >> ofs.redirect remote >>fi >> >>If I did use like this, it did work: >> >>ofs.redirect target if named dataserver >>ofs.redirect remote if named redirector >>ofs.redirect remote if named supervisor >> >>(dataserver,redirector,supervisor) are INSTANCE_NAMES which I am setting >>through command line argument -n. >> >>Do am I missing something ? like badly comprehend the if statement syntax ? >>Thank for any advice >> >>Pavel >> >> >>