Hi Kerstin,
good suggestion!
Heiko
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
>
> Hi Heiko,
>
> can we make the abstract a little bit (even) more vague,
> so that there is a little hint for the unfolding in there,
> without anyone noticing if it does not get in in the
> end? See below...
>
> > our aim is to have the Vub-Partial BF analysis ready as a
> > publication for the summer conferences.
> > For the summer conferences we need to provide an abstract
> > by 10th of April. Here is a first version (a modified version
> > of what has been submitted last time):
> >
> >
> > Charmless semileptonic decays, B -> X_u l nu, are studied
> > in a sample of 232 million B Bbar decays recorded with the
> > BaBar detector, in events where the decay of the second
> > B meson is fully reconstructed. Inclusive charmless decays
> > are selected in kinematic regions where the dominant
> > background from semileptonic B decays to charm is reduced
> > by requirements on various kinematic variables from which
> > the partial branching fraction DeltaB(B -> X_u l nu) is
> > measured.
> > The CKM matrix element |V_{ub}| is extracted by using
> > theoretical calculations of phase space acceptances.
> > Theoretical uncertainties in this extrapolation are
> > reduced by using the inclusive b -> s gamma photon
> > spectrum
>
> Maybe similarly to last summer, we could replace
>
> > and moments of the b -> c l nu lepton energy
> > and hadronic invariant mass.
>
> and spectral moments from semileptonic B decays.
>
> ?
>
> Cheers,
> Kerstin
>
