 |
 |
Is this the unbinned or the binned fit? Heiko On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi all, > > I have updated my web page > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html with the > latest studies on Thorsten's signal pdf. > > I used only Thorsten's signal pdf to fit signal MC. Here the bias > (defined as number of entries in histogram - number of events fitted) is > very little. Then I fitted all MC adding the argus and crystall ball to > describe the background. In this case the bias is higher, outside the 1 > sigma error, but not as large as when I tried with gauz as signal PDF. > > The fit on data doesn't look good, probably I have to relax some parameters. > > I also looked at the chisquared scaling: most probably something is > wrong since the fit gives back the same values when I use different > multiplying error factors. > > Any suggestions? > > Ciao > Antonio > >