Hi Kerstin,
that is exactly what I meant. The sample is right the same but yields
are different. This happened just by switching to chi^2 fit.
Probably I'm doing something wrong... but it's not clear to me where: I
have followed the example on roofit web site
(http://roofit.sourceforge.net/docs/classref/examples/fitgen3.cc.html)
to make the chi^2 fit.
Do ou have any suggestion?
Bye...
Antonio
Kerstin Tackmann ha scritto:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> can you be a little more clear what you mean by "numbers look quite
> strange"? Do you fit the same samples as on April 12th? The yields
> seem to be very different. But maybe I am just not comparing the
> correct numbers...
>
> Thanks,
> Kerstin
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> on the web page
>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html
>>
>> I posted the result of the chi^2 scaling using a minimum chi^2 fit.
>> This time we can see a variation on the yields and errors, but numbers
>> look quite strange...
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>>
