 |
 |
Hi Antonio, what about the fits prior to this change? Did you use the standard selection as well? Are you aware of any differences between the two productions? Thanks, Kerstin On Fri, 12 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi Kerstin, > > regarding to the charged and neutrals selection, I've used the standard > selection, according to Wolfgang's map (files have been taken from > /nfs/farm/babar/AWGsemilep01/menges/summer06/store.2/Vubrec-def/reduced/). > > Ciao, > Antonio > > Kerstin Tackmann ha scritto: > > Hi Antonio, > > > > what are the differences between the files you have been using so far and > > the files you have been using for these new fits? Are you using the same > > track and neutral selection for example? Any other differences? > > > > Thanks, > > Kerstin > > > > > > On Fri, 12 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > > > >> Hi Heiko > >> > >> I've rerun the mES fit with the same program used for plots posted on 05 > >> May but with files from new production. > >> > >> there are small differences in chisquare, in general with new files we > >> have a worsening. Furthermore for Signal MC, the fit has ERROR MATRIX > >> NOT POSITIVE DEFINITE. Yields are similar, even though not in 1 sigma > >> region. > >> > >> I have posted it on the usual web page: > >> > >> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html > >> > >> Currently I'm working on rescaling non BBbar MC to fit it. > >> > >> Ciao, > >> Antonio > >> > >> Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > >>> Hi ANtonio, > >>> > >>> any news from mES fit on MC including non-BBbar MC? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Heiko > >>> >