 |
 |
Hi Antionio, that looks now much better. What is not cleat to me is your statement that now it is 'non extended chi^2 fit'. Could you please explain what you mean? Cheers, Heiko On Wed, 3 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi Heiko, > I was just finishing the update of this section.... > > > > I have just seen that there is something new. > > > > * You say that it is now a non-extended chi^2 fit. > > Could you please give some technical details? > > Also, it would be interesting to see the fitted > > parameters. > > > Now the table is complete! > > > * Should we compare these results with the ones > > posted at April 12th? > > No, those are wrong since there is no scaling with the errors. > > > > > * Could you please post on your webpage somewhere > > the numbers of entries in the histo for > > a) data > > b) MC > > > Sure, I added these informations right below the title. > I write them also here: > > a) data = 437889 > b) MC = 1561024 > > > * It might be also helpful to provide the sum of the > > fitted yields in order to see how it compares to the > > number of entries in the histo. > > > Ok, I will add this now. > > Bye, > Antonio > > > Cheers, > > Heiko >