 |
 |
Hi Jochen, all, in that case we should for the AWG page to be updated and than update VVF accordingly I guess... otherwise we will just produce a lot of 3d weights and not really use them anyway. Cheers, Kerstin On Mon, 15 May 2006, Jochen Dingfelder wrote: > > Hi Kerstin, > > I think the currently best BF measurement for B->omegalnu comes from > Belle: (1.3 +/-0.4 +/-0.2 +/-0.3) x 10^-4. This measurement has only 22% > rel. uncertainty, compared to the 100% uncertainty we quote on the > AWG reweighting page, where due to ignorance the omega BF was simply set > equal to the rho0 BF. > We should update all the BF tables on the SL AWG web page soon! > > Cheers, > Jochen > > > > Hi, > > > > I recognized that we do the following reweighting for B->omega l nu > > events: > > > > # B- -> omega0 l- nubar + CC > > 1.03 #1.34/1.3; > > > > according to wfermifile.dat (but we had this number already when it was > > hardcoded in VirClass::Loop). The AWG reweighting page gives 1.45 as the > > new central value to be obtained by reweighting. Is the above a typo or is > > anyone aware of any reason why we else we might be using a different value > > than suggested at the AWG reweighting page? Or were there changes to the > > page you are aware of? > > > > If I do not hear anything to the contrary I will assume this to be a typo > > and fix it. > > > > Cheers, > > Kerstin > > > > > > >