 |
 |
Hi Kerstin, > in that case we should for the AWG page to be updated and than update VVF > accordingly I guess... otherwise we will just produce a lot of 3d > weights and not really use them anyway. You're right, that would probably be the best solution ... I would propose using the values from the winter 06 HFAG page (averages if available, otherwise best measurements): http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/semi/winter06/winter06.shtml pilnu -> HFAG average rholnu -> BABAR Phys .Rev. D72, 051102 (2005) omega -> Belle Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:131803 (2004) eta -> CLEO Phys. Rev. D 68, 072003 (2003) eta' -> = eta (but 100% error) a,b,f,... -> 0 non res -> incl. - excl. Does anybody have a different opinion? Ciao, Jochen