 |
 |
Hi Antonio, concerning the fits for the peaking BG shape parameters: What is the difference in the shape parameters wrt the fit w/o the non-BBbar mixed in? Cheers, Heiko On Thu, 18 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi all, > > > 1) For the MC fit including non-BBbar events: > > Provide scaled signal yield numbers such that we can compare the > > fit result directly with the expected numer of signal events > > I have reweighted non BBbar MC to BBbar MC lumonisity for a direct > comparison of yields. Result of the fit on this MC sample is on the > usual web page (www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html) > > Ciao, > Antonio >