Print

---

Hi,

I forgot to mention that the particpants agreed
on a phone meeting on Monday, noon, European time.
I'll call them. If there other intersted parties
let me know. Then it might be easier to have a
phone conference.

Cheers,
Heiko

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> here is a short summary of the phone meeting.
> 
> Participants: Wolfgang, Antonio, Concezio, Heiko
> 
> * We observe a 3.7% bias for signal in the full MC fit.
> * The Argus parameters found in the full MC fit and in the 
>   fit of combinatoric+peaking BG including non-BBbar events 
>   are different.
> * The peaking BG yield for the combinatoric+peaking BG fit
>   is different between using only BBbar or BBbar+non-BBbar.
> 
> Since we do not know how to fix the peaking BG yield in the
> fit on data we decide to freeze our fit configuration as it
> is and will determine with extreme choices how the ratio of
> BR is influenced.
> 
> Nevertheless Antonio will go on to understand further what's
> going on:
> 1) Repeat the full MC fit with the ARGUS parameter fixed to
>    the one found on the fit in combinatoric+peaking BG including 
>    non-BBbar events
>    We should then find a signal yield in much better agreement
>    with the expected yield.
> 2) Perform a fit with all cuts applied.
> 
> Wolfgang:
> 1) Provide a VVF-tag by today
> 2) Fix p* problem (hopefully until tomorrow)
> 
> Chukwudi would the supposed to perform the mm2 scans tomorrow
> 
> Heiko: Inform the convenors about the status.
> 
> Cheers,
> Heiko
>