 |
 |
Sheila, I'm very sorry but it does not seem to work currently from my phone to call more than 2 persons :-((( Heiko On Mon, 22 May 2006, Sheila Mclachlin wrote: > > I'm at (650) 926-8566. > > sheila > > > > On Mon, 22 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm back. Please send me your numbers. > > > > Heiko > > > > On Mon, 22 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > from my office I can't call more than 1 phone, moreover I've never used > > > the conference system you're talking about. > > > I try to see if I get some informations about it. > > > > > > Antonio > > > > > > Wolfgang Menges ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I can't call anybody. Antonio, can you call more than one or can > > > > you set up the italian conference system? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > On Sun, 21 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> I have just returned from a trip and learnt that two members of my > > > >> family have to go to medical doctors tomorrow. As a consequence, > > > >> it is not guaranteed that I'm able to attend at noon. > > > >> > > > >> Nevertheless, we should not postpone the meeting. > > > >> Concezio has sent me his mobile phone number: +39 349 149 1984 > > > >> > > > >> I hope that someone from you is able to call the others or to > > > >> organize a phone conference on its own. E.g. there is an italian > > > >> phone conference system which we have been using the past. > > > >> > > > >> Heiko > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> I forgot to mention that the particpants agreed > > > >>> on a phone meeting on Monday, noon, European time. > > > >>> I'll call them. If there other intersted parties > > > >>> let me know. Then it might be easier to have a > > > >>> phone conference. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Heiko > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> here is a short summary of the phone meeting. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Participants: Wolfgang, Antonio, Concezio, Heiko > > > >>>> > > > >>>> * We observe a 3.7% bias for signal in the full MC fit. > > > >>>> * The Argus parameters found in the full MC fit and in the > > > >>>> fit of combinatoric+peaking BG including non-BBbar events > > > >>>> are different. > > > >>>> * The peaking BG yield for the combinatoric+peaking BG fit > > > >>>> is different between using only BBbar or BBbar+non-BBbar. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Since we do not know how to fix the peaking BG yield in the > > > >>>> fit on data we decide to freeze our fit configuration as it > > > >>>> is and will determine with extreme choices how the ratio of > > > >>>> BR is influenced. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Nevertheless Antonio will go on to understand further what's > > > >>>> going on: > > > >>>> 1) Repeat the full MC fit with the ARGUS parameter fixed to > > > >>>> the one found on the fit in combinatoric+peaking BG including > > > >>>> non-BBbar events > > > >>>> We should then find a signal yield in much better agreement > > > >>>> with the expected yield. > > > >>>> 2) Perform a fit with all cuts applied. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Wolfgang: > > > >>>> 1) Provide a VVF-tag by today > > > >>>> 2) Fix p* problem (hopefully until tomorrow) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Chukwudi would the supposed to perform the mm2 scans tomorrow > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Heiko: Inform the convenors about the status. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > >>>> Heiko > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Wolfgang Menges > > > > Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35 > > > > Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road > > > > London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA > > > > ++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503 > > > > [log in to unmask] > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >