 |
 |
Hi Antonio, that looks quite good wrt the fitted event yield on MC and also wrt to the pulls in data fit. I would vote to stick to this fit configuration and move on so that we can check now if a MM2 scan shows reasonable stability in the BF extraction. A few questions: 1) Do you have also a non-extended chi^2 fit on data? 2) I'm a bit surprised when comparing your fit on data with the plot shown at April 19: The statistics is not exactly the same (order 20% difference). Why is that? 3) In addition, the deviation in the plot of April 19 looks worse. However, the chi^2 of that fit is significantly better compared to the current number of 6.48. Do we understand why? 4) Do we need a crosscheck wrt different run periods? I.e. check if the machinery works when fitting on Run1/2, Run3 and Run4? Cheers, Heiko On Sat, 6 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just updated the web page with latest results: > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html > > Have a nice weekend > > Antonio >