Hi Heiko, with 'non extended chi^2 fit' I actually meant that I performed a minumum chi^2 fit with model that was built using a different syntax w.r.t. the one I have used until now... If I have understood correctly, in RooFit when you specify the range for the numbers of events for all the PDF in your model, i.e.: RooRealVar argusevent("","argus",10000,0,200000); //Argus events RooRealVar crisballevent("","crisball",10000,0,200000); //cb events RooRealVar signalevent("","signal",10000,0,20000); //signal events RooAbsPdf model("","model",RooArgList(argus,cristalball,signal),RooArgList(argusevent,crisball,signalevent)); the model is extended by default, while doing something like: RooRealVar argusfrac("","argus",0.5,0,1); //Argus fraction RooRealVar signalfrac("","signal",0.5,0,1); //signal fraction RooAbsPdf model("","model",RooArgList(argus,signal,cristalball),RooArgList(argusfrac,signalfrac)); the model is non-extended. So this time I used the latter definition to build the model and then I performed the chi^2 fit. Antonio Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > Hi Antionio, > > that looks now much better. > > What is not cleat to me is your statement > that now it is 'non extended chi^2 fit'. > > Could you please explain what you mean? > > Cheers, > Heiko > > > On Wed, 3 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > >> Hi Heiko, >> I was just finishing the update of this section.... >> >> >>> I have just seen that there is something new. >>> >>> * You say that it is now a non-extended chi^2 fit. >>> Could you please give some technical details? >>> Also, it would be interesting to see the fitted >>> parameters. >>> >> Now the table is complete! >> >>> * Should we compare these results with the ones >>> posted at April 12th? >> No, those are wrong since there is no scaling with the errors. >> >>> * Could you please post on your webpage somewhere >>> the numbers of entries in the histo for >>> a) data >>> b) MC >>> >> Sure, I added these informations right below the title. >> I write them also here: >> >> a) data = 437889 >> b) MC = 1561024 >> >>> * It might be also helpful to provide the sum of the >>> fitted yields in order to see how it compares to the >>> number of entries in the histo. >>> >> Ok, I will add this now. >> >> Bye, >> Antonio >> >>> Cheers, >>> Heiko