 |
 |
Hi Heiko, I've just completed the update for this section: I've added also a link in the page to the table with all parameters. Anyway parameters for peaking BG with non-BBbar mixed in have larger error, and the 1 sigma region covers the values found on MC without non BBbar. They look very similar to me. Antonio Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > Hi Antonio, > > concerning the fits for the peaking BG shape parameters: > What is the difference in the shape parameters wrt the > fit w/o the non-BBbar mixed in? > > Cheers, > Heiko > > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >>> 1) For the MC fit including non-BBbar events: >>> Provide scaled signal yield numbers such that we can compare the >>> fit result directly with the expected numer of signal events >> I have reweighted non BBbar MC to BBbar MC lumonisity for a direct >> comparison of yields. Result of the fit on this MC sample is on the >> usual web page (www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html) >> >> Ciao, >> Antonio >>