 |
 |
Hi Heiko, I've posted two fit that have converged on my page. MC is a mixing of non BBbar and generic BBbar. Then the same code has been used on data. Fit on MC looks very good, and also on data... we still have the some problem on endpoint. The purple line is the Argus pdf for ccbar and uds. Bye, Antonio Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > Hi Antonio, > > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > >> Hi Heiko, >> fitting the non BBbar MC the parameter that we get for the Argus PDF >> is very similar to the BBbar MC (Argus Shape parameter is 24.89 ± 0.37 >> now w.r.t. the other value 25.23 ± 0.4 - see >> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html) >> >> So it seems that this background is already described by the one Argus >> we have been using. Is that right? > In principle, yes. Nevertheless, it would good to see the effect > in the combination. > > Cheers, > Heiko > >> Antonio >> >> Heiko Lacker ha scritto: >>> Hi, >>> >>> any news from the fit on MC when mixing in the non-BBbar MC? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Heiko >>>