 |
 |
Hi Antonio, could you please also post the result for the fit parameters? Heiko On Mon, 15 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi Heiko, > I've posted two fit that have converged on my page. > > MC is a mixing of non BBbar and generic BBbar. Then the same code has > been used on data. > Fit on MC looks very good, and also on data... we still have the some > problem on endpoint. > > The purple line is the Argus pdf for ccbar and uds. > > Bye, > Antonio > > Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > > Hi Antonio, > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > > > >> Hi Heiko, > >> fitting the non BBbar MC the parameter that we get for the Argus PDF > >> is very similar to the BBbar MC (Argus Shape parameter is 24.89 ± 0.37 > >> now w.r.t. the other value 25.23 ± 0.4 - see > >> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html) > >> > >> So it seems that this background is already described by the one Argus > >> we have been using. Is that right? > > In principle, yes. Nevertheless, it would good to see the effect > > in the combination. > > > > Cheers, > > Heiko > > > >> Antonio > >> > >> Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> any news from the fit on MC when mixing in the non-BBbar MC? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Heiko > >>> >