Hi Antonio,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> the numbers I got for the B/D decays systematics come from the ratio
> between the RMS and the Mean of the histogram containing the results
> from the 100 fits with different random seed.
>
> Last year I got the numbers for the systematics fitting the results with
> a gaussian. By repeating the same exercise with this production I have
>
> mx < 1.7, q2 > 8 0.762310% (for the D) and 5.238702% (for the B), which
> is quite compatible with last year.
>
> The reason of the discrepancy is that the distributions don't look
> gaussian after all.
For me these distributions look gaussian for 100 entries. The B one is
okay, in the D might me a second peak, but still the statistics are low.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
>
> Plots for the two distributions are attached in this email.
>
> ciao
> Antonio
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Menges
Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
[log in to unmask]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
