The first interest of what Chukwudi should look into is
the difference in charged and neutral Breco yields for
data and MC.
Cheers,
Heiko
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Menges wrote:
> Hi Chukwudi,
>
> you have to tell us what the problem is. It is not working doesn't
> help. Anyway, I am not sure if this will really help you. If you do it in
> this way, the generic MC will be treated as data, that means no
> corrections at all. You have to be careful to what you compare this. Then
> you should switch off B and D reweighting. Still, the vub part will be
> different (generic vs signal/hybrid).
>
> Another option is to change the variable FITMC in subVirFit.pl, which is
> passe on to VVF. It is accessed via the a.isfitMC() method. The only
> problem here is that you also have to update chains in subVirFit.pl and
> add also res signal MC in VVF. And you have to check, what kind of
> corrections are applied.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wolfgang
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I'm trying to submit jobs that use Generic Monte Carlo as data and
> > I seem to be unable to do this by editing the usual place in subVirFit.pl (
> > $ENV{FILEDATA}= "${dirP}onpeakChainRun1-4 1";).
> > Can you help?
> > Cheers, C.C.
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wolfgang Menges
> Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
> Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
> London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
> ++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
> [log in to unmask]
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
