Hi Wolfgang, you are correct about the re-weighting also I believe that
one should change the flag -rew 12 to -rew 2 (the default NO re-weighting
value) no?
C.C.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Menges wrote:
> Hi Chukwudi,
>
> you have to tell us what the problem is. It is not working doesn't
> help. Anyway, I am not sure if this will really help you. If you do it in
> this way, the generic MC will be treated as data, that means no
> corrections at all. You have to be careful to what you compare this. Then
> you should switch off B and D reweighting. Still, the vub part will be
> different (generic vs signal/hybrid).
>
> Another option is to change the variable FITMC in subVirFit.pl, which is
> passe on to VVF. It is accessed via the a.isfitMC() method. The only
> problem here is that you also have to update chains in subVirFit.pl and
> add also res signal MC in VVF. And you have to check, what kind of
> corrections are applied.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wolfgang
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'm trying to submit jobs that use Generic Monte Carlo as data and
>> I seem to be unable to do this by editing the usual place in subVirFit.pl (
>> $ENV{FILEDATA}= "${dirP}onpeakChainRun1-4 1";).
>> Can you help?
>> Cheers, C.C.
>>
>>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wolfgang Menges
> Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
> Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
> London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
> ++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
> [log in to unmask]
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
