 |
 |
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Hi, > > yes, tomorrow morning would be good for me as well. > What about 11:00 a.m. Central Europe time? yes, that's OK with me. Francesca > > Cheers, > Heiko > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > for the meeting I would prefer tomorrow morning. > > In the meantime I can start to fit the double ratios with a P0. > > > > cheers, > > Antonio > > > > Francesca Di Lodovico ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I find the results for the 2D double ratio plots encouraging: > > >> > > >> The enriched sample shows that data/MC is rather flat. The same holds > > >> for the depleted sample. Moreover, the double ratios for the enriched > > >> and depleted samples are similar. > > >> > > >> As the ratios are flat I would propose to calculate a weighted mean > > >> for both, the enriched and the depleted sample. > > >> > > > > > > I was thinking that the plots (double ratio plots mainly) can be fit with > > > a P0. In this way we can quantify how constant is the double ratio. > > > Actually, from the P0 parameter we can also get which is the correction > > > factor for the data. > > > > > >> Other comments? (The situation is obviously not so clear for the mX > > >> analysis). > > > > > > I agree that what to do for the 1D analysis is less clear. > > > However, there are large uncertainties for the enriched sample. > > > Perhaps for the enriched sample we can enlarge the binning such to have > > > smaller errors and then fit it again with a P0? > > > > > > BTW, do we want to meet up this afternoon or tomorrow morning (I'm not > > > available tomorrow afternoon) such to finalize what to do with all the > > > fits? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Francesca > > >