 |
 |
Any idea what the reason for the larger error is? Heiko On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi, > > I've completed the B/D BR systematics. The table below shows the > numbers. > > B D > -----------|----------|-------| > mx < 1.55 | 2.69% | 2.93% | > -----------|----------|-------| > mx < 1.625 | 3.22% | 1.81% | > -----------|----------|-------| > mx < 1.7 | 3.27% | 2.06% | > -----------|----------|-------| > mx < 1.7 | 6.58% | 1.70% | > q2 > 8 | | | > -----------|----------|-------| > P+ < 0.66 | 3.19% | 1.41% | > -----------|----------|-------| > mx < 1.55 | 2.47% | 1.70% | > babar SF | | | > -----------|----------|-------| > > There is an increase in the 2D analysis: last years we had 0.74% for the > D BR and 4.88% for B SL BR. > > cheers, > > Antonio >