Sheila, just to say that I am not sure about the answer either... I would try to cross check with Thorsten's BAD (I think this parametrization came from him). Or just call in tomorrow to the vub-recoil meeting and bug whoever wrote this part of the BAD... that is sometimes the most effective thing. Kerstin On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Sheila Mclachlin wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > No one has answered my question yet. > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/VUB-RECOIL/archives/vub-recoil.200606/ date/article-85.html > > If you don't > have time for a long answer, could someone at least > send a yes/no answer (as in "yes, there is a mistake in the BAD" > or "no, there is no mistake, it is you who is confused")? > > Thanks, > > sheila > > > On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > > > Hi Sheila, > > > > sorry for not having responded so far. > > I'll have a look asap. > > > > Cheers, > > Heiko > > > > On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Sheila Mclachlin wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is anyone going to answer the question about > > > BAD 1383 that I sent? > > > > > > sheila > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >