 |
 |
Thanks for checking! Now I will stop bothering you. Cheers, sheila On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi Sheila, > > there are mistakes in table 7, 8, 9 (in the BAD 1383 v.3): the value of > sigma_L for the signal function reported in the tables are in GeV, not > in MeV.... > > Actually I fixed these tables but only in the CVS version of the BAD. > > Thank you for spotting all these mistakes! > > Cheers, > Antonio > > > > Hi! Thanks for answering that. I am pretty sure it is supposed > > to have an "n", because otherwise the matching at the boundaries > > doesn't work. Anyway, that's what's in the VirVubFitter. > > > > Now all that remains is my second question, which I > > have pasted below: > > > > (2) The signal function drawn in Figure 4 LOOKS like it has: > > > > * x_c ~ 5.28 GeV = 5280 MeV > > * (alpha*sigma_l) ~ 1 GeV = 1000 MeV > > * sigma_l ~ sigma_R1, sigma_R2 > > > > However, according to Table 7: > > > > * x_c = 5.2795 GeV = 5279.5 MeV > > * (alpha*sigma_l) = 0.000008484 GeV = 0.008484 MeV > > * sigma_l << sigma_R1, sigma_R2 > > > > I tried to check by plotting the function with the > > given fit parameters in ROOT, but it did not work > > because ROOT could not handle the exponential > > of (x - x_c)/sigma_l, since sigma_l is so tiny. > > > > Am I missing something, or is there a mistake, or what? > > > > Thanks, > > > > sheila > > > > >