 |
 |
Given the fact that during August most of the people who are familiar with the analysis are in vacation it seems to be unrealistic to go to the RC by mid-September. Heiko On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Jochen Dingfelder wrote: > > Hi Heiko et al.: > > Thanks for informing us about your target time schedule. > The PAC/DPAC were hoping to send your analysis to DPF, > i.e. the analysis would have to go to RC by mid-September. > Looking at your schedule this seems unlikely, right? > Could you please confirm? We will then let the PAC know. > > Thanks, > Jochen > > > here is our publication time schedule: > > > > End of July: Documentation of new strategy of mES fit into BAD > > (Antonio & Concezio) > > Also D** issue? > > August: Parallel work: > > * Working on backup solution (Wolfgang) > > --> higher purity cut: Old model > > * New strategy with higher purity cut (Chukwudi) > > CM (Sept.): Presentation of mES fit strategy > > Supporting document with fixed mES strategy --> AWG > > End of Sep: Analysis to RC (fit strategy approved?) > > Beg. of Oct: If yes: Evaluation of systematics > > Mid of Oct: Paper draft to RC and then to CWR > > > > Our attempt to find a new well-controlled mES fit strategy > > despite a lot of work has not converged to a stable version > > yet. We suspect that we are suffering from the low purity. > > As a consequence, we will try to understand if we can find > > a stable solution with tighter cuts on purity. In parallel, > > Wolfgang will look into the same direction but try to under- > > stand if we could simply use in this case our old strategy > > as a fall-back solution. > > > > A status report does not seem possbile before the September > > CM due to the August holiday period. > > > > Cheers, > > Heiko > > > > >